Danny is a co-founder and director of Debuilt Property and has a professional career spanning architecture, construction, project management, development and property finance. Debuilt provides a wide range of property, development and monitoring services to investors, financiers, property owners and developers.

This week a small group of property professionals caught up for our monthly breakfast discussion. The core group includes senior executives from Charter Keck Cramer, Merricks Capital, SJB Architects, SJB Planning, Debuilt Property and half a dozen guests. Most of us have a working relationship, so the discussion is always open and informative.

Matt O’Halloran is head of Merricks Capital property lending business. Along with Neil Slonim (ex NAB) and several developers sitting around the table, it did not take long for the discussion to veer towards bank versus non-bank lending in the property and construction sector.

As most in the property industry are acutely aware, traditional bank finance has reduced to a trickle to all but the most significant corporate customers. The banks want to lend, but with APRA’s tightening regulatory requirements, the banking royal commission and the property market slowdown, it has become difficult for bank managers to obtain approval for even their most valued clients.

This has left developers frequently unable to meet the banks’ covenant requirements and pre-sale or commercial pre-commitment hurdles.  

These constraints have assisted rapid growth in the non-bank lending sector.  Interestingly, Matt O’Halloran noted whilst it is estimated that non-bank lending is now approaching 15-20% of the commercial property sector, in North America and Europe it is estimated at around 35-40%.

The pricing might be higher, but the availability of nonbank lending means that developers are able to move forward with certainty to achieve sales hurdles and complete building contracts. It’s a lot easier to close an apartment sale or lock down a competitive build contract if the other party knows that the project is proceeding. And let’s not forget protecting town planning permits with looming expiry dates. In addition, non-bank lenders are typically more nimble and able to transact with speed and responsiveness, which is critical to the execution of the project.

The other factor for developers, who work on maximizing leverage of equity, is that a higher finance cost but with a lower equity requirement can still result in a pretty healthy equity IRR.

An example, reported in this week’s AFR, is a loan by Merricks Capital to Goldfields for its $300million commercial office building in South Yarra. The project has no pre-lease commitments – which is not unusual for suburban office projects. In these circumstances project finance would be impossible to obtain through the traditional banking sector. Matt O’Halloran explained that the combination of security structuring, the calibre of the parties and the high quality of the project supported the finance package.

The group also discussed mezzanine finance and the suggestion that some banks are once again open to a capital structure that includes a subordinated second mortgage sitting between equity and the bank as senior lender. Apparently, banks who are eager to participate are being pro-active at forging a marriage of capital. 

But a developer has to take into account dealing with two financiers, two sets of loan documents, negotiating a challenging inter-creditor deed, a more complex builder’s side deed and a blended interest rate. This means dealing with a non-bank lender may be a lot easier and no more expensive. Managing multiple parties adds complexity, consumes valuable time and heightens the uncertainty of the end result.

Overall, it was apparent that a combination of bank and non-bank lending is a great thing and has in fact been critical to maintaining forward momentum in property construction.

It is worth noting that there was a view around the table that a shake up in the banking sector was needed, but there is also over enthusiasm in criticising all things banking. The consensus was that we have enjoyed, and need to continue to enjoy, a strong and stable banking sector.

Whilst navigating the development funding labyrinth is challenging, there are now multiple options available. This is a good thing for the industry.

A final take-away was that, whilst finance may be viewed as a commodity, the relationship between borrower and lender is as important as it ever was.